|
Culling
Dec 17, 2010 6:16:33 GMT -5
Post by tundratreasures on Dec 17, 2010 6:16:33 GMT -5
What is your criteria is it good color/density or balancing that with body.
I'm at the point of thinning a litter and kinda lost as what I think is good, and what the judges will think is good.
|
|
|
Culling
Dec 17, 2010 14:14:46 GMT -5
Post by rachel on Dec 17, 2010 14:14:46 GMT -5
How old are they? I was told pick at 6 weeks, or after 4 months and I kept that first litter just to test the theory and it's spot on. Severe uglies in between.
I'm aiming for type first, then color, but of course, ideally, a well-colored typy rabbit. What are the pedigrees of the litters you're looking at right now?
|
|
|
Culling
Dec 17, 2010 17:51:34 GMT -5
Post by tundratreasures on Dec 17, 2010 17:51:34 GMT -5
CT112 f2xSC's 62, my grand champ from state CT 112 F2x SC doe
they are about to hit the uglies
|
|
|
Culling
Dec 19, 2010 4:54:52 GMT -5
Post by tundratreasures on Dec 19, 2010 4:54:52 GMT -5
Ok, so they are hitting the fuglys I am disappointed by the color, almost all of them have beautify color, most have light bellys, but what kinda pisses me off, is that this great color just doesn't carry down. I don't know if this is just this stage or this cross. I have a few with an early top line, and a couple that tend to a more mandolin shape.
Can you post a pic with a good explanation, cause I'm still learning. Or would me taking pose and color pics of each rabbit be more helpful?
|
|
|
Culling
Dec 19, 2010 15:01:56 GMT -5
Post by rachel on Dec 19, 2010 15:01:56 GMT -5
When in doubt, Jack, keep them longer.
I think pictures would be very helpful. Maybe some more experienced breeders will chime in, too. With those bloodlines, you SHOULD have decent color. Leslie's stock is known for the richness of the color, and I am actually pretty impressed with the doe out of CT112 as far as color goes, even though it's not quite as rich. It might just be the age! You said they're about to hit the uglies, but didn't say how old?
|
|
|
Culling
Dec 19, 2010 22:27:27 GMT -5
Post by tundratreasures on Dec 19, 2010 22:27:27 GMT -5
11 or 12 weeks I think. yeah they hit the fugly, but I think it has more to do with the fur and head esp. the ears, and I hate it cause it's a pain to choose which is ok, and which isn't, at about 4 mo I have an easier time, but it is still difficult, esp with the fur color.
|
|
|
Culling
Dec 19, 2010 23:09:10 GMT -5
Post by rachel on Dec 19, 2010 23:09:10 GMT -5
Uploaded with ImageShack.us3 Months Uploaded with ImageShack.us4 months Everything falls apart at that age. The topline! The head! The ears! Ack! Don't fret. These two are 4 and 5 months old now and I can barely tell the difference between them, they look pretty good. (The color is very good on both, much better than the photos.) It's really astonishing how much they come together in such a short period of time.
|
|
|
Culling
Dec 20, 2010 1:50:52 GMT -5
Post by tundratreasures on Dec 20, 2010 1:50:52 GMT -5
Yeah, I have them right when they are all fluffy in the fur dull in color and the only thing to judge on is the body and bone. So I do need to sit down and rate them, then keep an eye to see who develops.
they are at the stage before your first photo, gangly, narrow and long in ear
|
|
|
Culling
Dec 20, 2010 1:52:10 GMT -5
Post by tundratreasures on Dec 20, 2010 1:52:10 GMT -5
BTW is your pose off in the second one, or is his top line early? I have a smooth rise with no break at the neck, but get hit for chopped hind end.
|
|
|
Culling
Dec 20, 2010 12:52:23 GMT -5
Post by rachel on Dec 20, 2010 12:52:23 GMT -5
They were both fighting the pose, so it's not a very accurate representation of topline.
Need to work with them more, just been so darn cold!
|
|
|
Culling
Dec 20, 2010 16:43:00 GMT -5
Post by tundratreasures on Dec 20, 2010 16:43:00 GMT -5
|
|